NYT stock: Allocaria Score and valuation gap
As of 26.10.2026, NEW YORK TIMES CO (NYT) has an Allocaria Score of 72 out of 100, which reads as “Good”. The price sits 15.6% below the model’s fair-value estimate. An estimate, not a price target.
NEW YORK TIMES CO · Consumer Discretionary · United States · large-cap company
Allocaria Score and gap to the model’s fair-value estimate
Allocaria Score
72 out of 100
Good Ratings as of 26.10.2026
A relative score on current evidence — not a probability, a price forecast or a guarantee.
Gap to the model’s fair-value estimate
+15.6%
The price sits 15.6% below the model’s fair-value estimate. An estimate, not a price target.
A positive figure means the price is below the model’s estimate; a negative figure means it is above.
What moves the score
- Quality lifts the score
- Quality (composite) lifts the score
Why: the two parts of the score that push it furthest from neutral — + lifts it, − lowers it. Nothing is shown when no part stands out.
Consumer Discretionary in Allocaria’s coverage
NEW YORK TIMES CO ranks 77th of 309 Consumer Discretionary companies in Allocaria’s coverage by Allocaria Score; the sector median is 60 out of 100.
Other Consumer Discretionary companies
Questions about this page
NEW YORK TIMES CO has an Allocaria Score of 72 out of 100 as of 26.10.2026, which reads as “Good”. A relative score on current evidence — not a probability, a price forecast or a guarantee.
The price sits 15.6% below the model’s fair-value estimate. An estimate, not a price target. A positive figure means the price is below the model’s estimate; a negative figure means it is above.
It helps a self-directed investor decide what to study further and what to set aside. A rank is not a probability and not an order.
It shows the ratings as of 26.10.2026. The page is refreshed when the ratings are, and it is withdrawn when the data is older than about six weeks.